A workbench for drafting patents. Claims today. Drawings and specifications next. Built so you can see exactly where every word came from.
Most AI writing tools treat patent claims like any other text. They are not.
A claim has to be new, well-explained, and clear enough to hold up later. Generic AI does not know the difference.
Draft Studio is built for that specific job — and nothing else.
Upload the inventor's disclosure. Draft Studio reads through it, points out what is missing, and asks the inventor a few clear questions to fill the gaps before any drafting begins.
Look at what is genuinely new and what makes the invention non-obvious — separately, the way examiners do. Add your own notes on the kind of claims you want before moving on.
Generate a first set of claims based only on what the disclosure actually says. A simple tree shows how each claim depends on the others. Common drafting mistakes are flagged right next to the claim.
One last review pass. Fix anything flagged, then export a clean Word file. Each claim element comes with a note pointing to the part of the disclosure that supports it.
Draft Studio follows how patent offices actually examine applications. Novelty and inventive step are looked at separately. Gaps in the disclosure surface early, before you spend time drafting. Common reasons examiners push back are caught before the file leaves your desk.
It does not replace the practitioner's judgment. It removes the friction that comes before it.
Draft Studio does not lock you into one AI provider. Pick the model you trust — switch it any time from settings. No code, no waiting on a developer.
Your choice of model is yours to make, and yours to change.
Every instruction the system sends to the AI is visible to you in the admin panel. Nothing is buried in code. You can see exactly what is being asked, at every step.
Edits take effect immediately. Every change is saved as a version, so you can roll back any time — no developer needed.
Adapting Draft Studio to your firm's house style or a specific jurisdiction does not need a developer or a config file.
Just write what you want in plain English — "always open with a technical field statement", "flag any claim that references a drawing without a figure number" — and save. The system makes sure you haven't broken anything important before applying it.
Claims are written from what the inventor actually disclosed — not from whatever the AI happens to know in general. The exported Word file includes a small appendix showing where each part of the claim came from.
Useful when you review it. Useful when an examiner asks. Useful when the client asks how you got there.
Draft Studio runs on your own server. Client disclosures and draft claims never leave it. Nothing is sent to third-party analytics. Logs stay with you, on your machine.
The server, the data, and the logs are yours.
The flow follows good drafting practice — make sure the disclosure is complete first, look at what is new and what is non-obvious separately, check the claims hang together properly before anything is filed.
Pick the jurisdiction when you start. Every stage knows which one you are working in.
Claims are the legal core of a patent — but they don't stand alone. A complete filing also needs drawings that match the claim language and a specification that explains how the invention actually works.
Draft Studio is growing to cover all three. Same disclosure, same workspace, same trail back to where every detail came from — now applied to figures and the written description as well.
One place to draft. Claims, drawings, and specification, all checking against each other.