Somewhere in your firm is a process that runs on copy, paste and waiting: an intake queue, a drafting step, a monthly report. We find it, design the version where AI does the first pass, and build it.
Scope and pricing agreed per engagement. Your data stays yours. Self-host where it matters.
We sit with the people who run the process and map it as it actually runs: who waits on whom, what gets retyped, where the queue builds up. Then we say what to build, what to buy, and what to leave alone.
We design the process again with AI on the first pass: it sorts the intake, drafts the document, fills the checklist. A person reviews, corrects and signs off. The decision stays with your staff.
We ship the software and wire it to what you already use. Existing tools, new tools, custom APIs. If it has a data layer, we can connect it.
You tell us the slow one. We ask what comes in, what goes out and who waits, and agree scope and price for that process alone.
We write the process down as it runs today, then as it would run with AI on the first pass. You see where the review step sits before anything is built.
We build it and run it beside the current process, on real work. Your staff check every AI output; what they correct, we fix.
It runs where you choose: self-hosted where it matters, on your own model accounts if you want them. We document it so your team can run it without us.
A process suits this when it runs often, starts from a document or a message, and ends with a person who can tell a good output from a bad one.
AI reads what arrives, pulls out the fields, and sorts it into the right queue with a suggested next step. A person checks the sort and takes the case.
AI writes the first draft from your templates and the source material, each line traced to its source. A person edits and signs.
AI reads the incoming letter, finds how similar ones were answered before, and drafts a reply. A person reviews, changes what is wrong, and sends it.
AI turns the way a job is done today into a written procedure and a checklist. A person approves the steps and runs them.
AI assembles the weekly or monthly report from the systems it comes from, with every number cited. A person reads it, questions it, and sends it.
AI turns a meeting transcript into decisions, open points and owners, each cited to the transcript. A person confirms them before anything goes out.
Every process we build has a review step with a name on it. The AI's output is a draft until a person says otherwise.
Self-host where it matters, use your own model accounts, and switch models when you want. No lock-in, no leakage.
Stop waiting for the perfect stack or the perfect moment. We build one process, run it on real work, and improve it from what the reviewers correct.
The products on this site are what this looks like when we build it. Draft Studio, Traverse and TM-Traverse draft for a person to review and sign; Observer answers from the transcript on your own server; Aaram turns SOPs into checklists.
A prosecution platform for patent attorneys. It reads the office action, finds what comparable cases actually did, and drafts a filing-ready response — every recommendation traced to the prosecution history it came from.
Learn more →A thinking partner in the room. Observer listens to your meeting, holds the context, and speaks only when asked. Every answer cites the transcript. Not a recorder.
Learn more →The operations system for service firms. Document SOPs, execute with checklists, track in real-time. From chaos to consistency.
Learn more →A workbench for drafting patents with AI you can actually trust. Every word traces back to the inventor's disclosure.
Learn more →That is the aim. We connect to existing tools, new tools and custom APIs; if it has a data layer, we can wire it in. If something cannot be connected, we tell you before we start.
The data is yours, always. Code ownership is agreed per engagement and written into the scope before we start.
Yes. Self-host where it matters, and use your own model accounts. Observer already runs that way, on the customer's own server.
Scope and price are agreed per engagement, one process at a time. There is no price list. Write to us with the process and we will reply with a scope.
No. It does the first pass; a person reviews, corrects and decides. Every process we design has a review step with a name on it.
Email contact@analystology.com and describe the process: what comes in, what goes out, where it waits. We will say plainly whether we can help.
Describe it in a few lines: what comes in, what goes out, who waits. We will say plainly where AI can take the first pass, and where it can't.